Council Meeting
Revised Agenda

C#03-21
-
(Electronic Meeting pursuant to Section 238(3.3) of the Municipal Act, 2001)

His Worship
Mayor Dave Barrow

PUBLIC NOTICE

 

Due to efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 and to protect all individuals, City facilities will not be open to the public to attend Council and Committee meetings until further notice.

 

Public Comments: The public may submit written correspondence regarding agenda matters by email to [email protected]. Written correspondence must be submitted by 12 p.m. the day before the meeting. Comments submitted will be provided to all Members of Council, considered as public information and noted in the public record.

 

Public Forum: Any person who wishes to speak to Council on a matter not on the agenda must pre-register with the Office of the Clerk by 12 p.m. noon the day before the meeting by email to [email protected] or by using the on-line form found on Richmondhill.ca. Public Forum will be by video conference via the internet or telephone only. A maximum of five persons will be allowed to register for the Public Forum on a first come first serve basis.

 

Electronic Delegations: The public may apply to appear as an electronic delegation by video conference or by telephone. Applications to appear as an electronic delegation must be submitted by 12 p.m. the day before the meeting by email to [email protected] or by using the on-line application form found on Richmondhill.ca. The Office of the Clerk will provide instructions on appearing as an electronic delegation.


  • That the minutes of Heritage Richmond Hill meeting HRH#07-20 held December 8, 2020 and the following recommendation be approved:

  • That the Heritage Richmond Hill Committee recommends to Council:

    a) That the Heritage Permit Application to implement the proposed woodland restoration plan as described in the David Dunlap Observatory Park Phase 2 South-West Detailed Woodland Restoration and Implementation Plan (attached as Appendix 'A' to staff report SRPI.20.039), be approved.

  • That the minutes of Youth Action Committee meeting held December 16, 2020 be approved.

(A copy of staff's presentation is attached for Council's reference)

  • That the Heritage Richmond Hill Committee recommends to Council:

    a) That the presentation by Tracey Steele, Director, Community Standards, and Joanne Leung, Manager, Urban Design, entitled "Protecting Heritage Properties - Monitoring, Maintenance and Enforcement", be received;

    b) That Council direct staff to explore different mechanisms for ensuring that designated properties continue to be properly managed and that they meet the standards of the Property Standards By-law while the owners are awaiting Development Application approvals;

    c) That Council direct staff to explore the opportunity to educate and inform property owners of their responsibilities under the Property Standards By-law;

    d) That Council direct staff to explore a mechanism to inform and educate residents of what is in the Property Standards By-law and that there is an ability to advise the City about properties that are not maintained up to Property standards.

(Staff report SRPI.21.011 is attached for Council's reference)

  • That the Heritage Richmond Hill Committee recommends to Council:

    a) That the property located at 16 Centre Street West does not merit cultural heritage designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act

    b) That 16 Centre Street West be removed from Richmond Hill’s Heritage Register.

(Staff report SRPI.21.016 is attached for Council's reference)

  • That the Heritage Richmond Hill Committee recommends to Council:

    a) That the Heritage Permit Application to allow the demolition and replication of the driveshed at 11121 Leslie Street as described in the Conservation and Replication Plan attached as Appendix B to staff report SRPI.21.016, be approved.

(The 2009 Heritage Policy Review and Key Directions Report, and the Heritage Review Discussion Paper, are attached for Council's reference)

  • That the Heritage Richmond Hill Committee recommends to Council:

    a) That Council direct staff to update the 2009 Heritage Policy Review and Key Directions Report, and the Heritage Review Discussion Paper, to include a framework that would allow for Heritage Richmond Hill Committee to provide input into the current update of the City of Richmond Hill's Official Plan Update.

  • a) That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the Heritage Restoration Agreement between the City of Richmond Hill and Tupelo Investments Limited to secure the careful protection and alteration of 33 Roseview Avenue as described in staff report SRPI.21.003, to be released upon the written recommendation of the Commissioner of Planning and Infrastructure; 

    b) That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the Heritage Restoration Agreement between the City of Richmond Hill and Elgin House Properties Ltd. to secure the careful protection and alteration of 1000 Elgin Mills Road East as described in staff report SRPI.21.003, to be released upon the written recommendation of the Commissioner of Planning and Infrastructure.

  • a) That the revised Zoning By-law Amendment and draft Plan of Subdivision applications submitted by Dora Homes Inc. for lands known as Lots 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 and 48, Plan 201 (Municipal Addresses: 91 Snively Street and 0 Glenmore Avenue), City Files D02-12039 and D03-12010, be approved, subject to the following:

    (i) that the subject lands be rezoned from Agricultural “A” Zone under By-law 1703, as amended, to “Single Detached Four (R4) Zone” and “Environmental Protection Area One (EPA1) Zone” under By-law 313-96, as amended, and that the amending Zoning By-law establish site specific development standards as set out in staff report SRPI.21.001;

    (ii) that prior to forwarding the final amending Zoning By-law to Council for consideration and enactment, the applicant pay the applicable processing fee in accordance with the City’s Tariff of Fees By-law;

    (iii) that the Plan of Subdivision as depicted on Map 7 to staff report SRPI.21.001 be draft approved, subject to the conditions as set out in Appendix “C” hereto;

    (iv) that prior to draft approval being granted, the applicant pay the applicable processing fee in accordance with the City’s Tariff of Fees By-law.

    b) That 13.99 persons equivalent of additional servicing allocation be assigned to the subject lands, to be released by the Commissioner of Planning and Infrastructure in accordance with By-law 109-11, as amended.

  • a) That the revised Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted by Brookside Castle Corporation for the lands known as Part of Lot 3 and Part of Block A, Plan 1642 (Municipal Address: 24 Brookside Road), City File D02-14031, be approved, subject to the following:

    (i) that the subject lands be rezoned from Flood (F) Zone under By-law 2523, as amended, and General Commercial One (GC1) Zone under By-law 190-87, as amended to Flood (F) Zone and General Commercial One (GC1) Zone under By-law 190-87, as amended, and that the amending Zoning By-law establish the site specific development standards as outlined in staff report SRPI.20.017 and staff report SRPI.21.015;

    (ii) that pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, Council deem that no further notice be required with respect to any necessary modifications to the draft amending Zoning By-law to implement the proposed development on the subject lands; 

    (iii) that prior to forwarding the final amending Zoning By-law to Council for consideration and enactment, the applicant pay the applicable processing fee in accordance with the City’s Tariff of Fees By-law.

    b) That all comments concerning the applicant’s related Site Plan application (City File D06-19061) be referred back to staff.

  • a) That staff report SRPI.21.019 regarding an update to the Sustainability Metrics Project, be received;

    b) That the recommended updates to the City’s Sustainability Metrics tool and threshold scoring as set out in staff report SRPI.21.019 be approved in principle subject to further consultation with building industry stakeholders (refer to Appendix 1 and Appendix 3 respectively);

    c) That the recommendations set out in staff report SRPI.21.019 to consider a three-pronged approach to incentives, consisting of: (1) financial, (2) awards and recognition and (3) capacity building be approved in principle, and that City Staff be directed to report back to Council with specific incentives and an implementation plan;

    d) That the recommended updates to the City’s Key Performance Indicator (KPI) to establish a target of 30% of Site Plan and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications obtaining a score above “good” be approved, and that City Staff be directed to monitor this target for efficacy; 

    e) That upon the finalization of the update to the metrics tools and corresponding threshold scores, City Staff provide sufficient advance notice to stakeholders of the forthcoming application of the updated tools and threshold scores to new Site Plan and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications.

  • a) That a capital budget of $95,000 be approved for a drainage investigation and interim drainage improvements for the existing Mill Street and Altamira Road residential area; 

    b) That the work be funded from the Water Quality Protection Reserve Fund.

  • a) That staff report SRPI.21.006 regarding Council Direction for Summitcrest Drive Noise Investigation, be received;

    b) That staff be directed to advise the residents of Summitcrest Drive that the City’s obligations with respect to noise mitigation for the Summitcrest community have been satisfied;

    c) That staff be directed to continue to assist the residents of Summitcrest Drive to work with CN Rail and Metrolinx to determine the impacts of the GO Rail expansion on the community and any mitigation requirements.

(Not previously proclaimed in the City of Richmond Hill)

  • a) That May 19, 2021 be proclaimed as Personal Support Worker Day in the City of Richmond Hill.

  • That the correspondence received regarding the Member Motion submitted by Councillor Muench regarding Permeable Pavement Solutions to address Climate Change, Secondary Suites and Stormwater Management for Driveways, Sidewalks and Parking Lots, be received:

    a) Gloria Marsh, York Region Environmental Alliance, dated January 22, 2021;

    b) Ellise Gasner, LID Permeable Paving/ Business Development and Sales, received January 25, 2021;

    c) Walter Herman, hydroPAVERS, dated January 25, 2021.

  • That the correspondence received regarding Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications submitted by Dora Homes Inc. for 91 Snively Street and 0 Glenmore Avenue, be received:

    a) George Kourtis, 12 Wolfson Crescent, dated January 25, 2021;

    b) Teresa Caravella, 14 Wolfson Crescent, dated January 26, 2021.

Moved by:       Councillor Muench

  • Whereas, climate change is affecting weather patterns, increasing the frequency and force of rain and flooding, leading to damaging and costly insurance and property damage; and

    Whereas, Richmond Hill and its residents have placed a high degree of importance on our natural environment and on being environmentally focused which includes reducing GHG emissions; and

    Whereas, the rapid growth of urbanization and densification in our City have led the landscape to become less Permeable due to coverage of buildings and paved surfaces; and

    Whereas, the increasing coverage of the landscape and subsequent decrease of natural drainage have led to more runoff entering our streams, rivers and lakes at an increasing rate, causing flooding in communities and roads, erosion of streams, destruction of wildlife / aquatic habitat and a rise in ground temperature; and

    Whereas, ageing stormwater infrastructure and the increasing imperviousness of cities all raise enormous challenges for sustainable urban stormwater management; and

    Whereas, conventional stormwater management approaches have not been successful in achieving the level of management necessary in maintaining base-flow characteristics in streams, to prevent stream erosion and to avoid degradation of water quality and aquatic habitat, and

    Whereas, Ontario Regulation 299/19 regarding additional residential unit dwellings and the effects of Bill 108, which became law in 2019 (as presented to Richmond Hill Council on December 2, 2020), require municipalities to update their official plans and zoning By-laws to permit additional residential units within houses that are single detached, semi-detached, townhouses, and also, within accessory structures, which inevitably, create a need for wider driveways, additional parking spaces, and tandem parking, which in turn will put increased stormwater burdens on our stormwater infrastructure that does not have the capacity to take this burden on unchecked; and

    Whereas, there is an emerging consensus by Conservation authorities and good planning principles that a larger proportion of stormwater should be managed naturally through our ecosystem, or if not possible, via alternatives that mimic the natural functions of pre-development hydrology; and

    Whereas, Municipalities and Conservation authorities including the Toronto and Regional Conservation Authority (TRCA) continue to study and actively advocate for alternatives to decrease water runoff into our storm and wastewater infrastructure by utilizing stormwater ponds, reducing Non- Permeable usage of lands, increasing tree canopy, and promoting “greener initiatives” over the past 20 years; and

    Whereas, the use and expansion of Stormwater Ponds should be minimized as Stormwater Ponds create safety, liability and health concerns to people and wildlife, and are magnets (breeding areas) for West Nile Virus.  Furthermore, Stormwater ponds are costly to land development, hurting housing affordability; and

    Whereas, Stormwater costs and subsequent stormwater tax rates continue to climb and have been increasing between 7.5% and 10% per year for the past 10 years; and

    backflow insurance claims on January 11, 2020 due to our lack of stormwater system capacity; and

    Whereas, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) has incentives and substantial grants available to encourage Municipalities to utilize Permeable products; and

    Whereas, Non Permeable traditional products used on driveways, sidewalks, and parking lots increase the imperviousness of land surfaces, resulting in increased volumes and rates of stormwater runoff, creating costly stormwater infrastructure maintenance and long term infrastructure costs to the City, taxpayer, and future residents; and

    Whereas, today, Permeable paving products and systems are cost competitive to NON- Permeable products, and have proven installations for over three decades throughout Europe, Asia, United States, and Canada, with successful installations in Ontario Municipalities including Richmond Hill, Mississauga, Kitchener, Pickering and Toronto, to name a few; and

    Whereas, incorporating “Permeable pavers and/or related Permeable systems” will reduce the Heat Island Effect, reducing the ground and Earth’s temperature; and

    Whereas, the use of Permeable pavers and systems can help reduce pressure on sewer systems, avoid erosion in yards, prevent lawn chemicals and contaminants from entering rivers and watersheds, and replenish local aquifers; and

    Whereas, cities including Richmond Hill require sustainable water management strategies, and have By-laws (84-03) that require the front of properties to be Permeable; and

    Whereas, Utilizing Permeable products and systems meets Goal 4 of our Strategic Plan, which is the use of “Wise Management of Resources”; and

    Whereas, Permeable pavers will save millions of dollars of repair, maintenance and replacement costs to our Stormwater management systems;

    Therefore Be It Resolved,

    1. That the Commissioner of Planning and Infrastructure be directed to make all efforts to assist in achieving the spirit and intent of the following and initiate any and all amendment processes where necessary to amend Richmond Hill By-laws including 84-03 (if necessary) to include:

    1.1 The following definitions (amendments as required) be added to our By-law(s) such as By-law 84-03 and all planning criteria as follows:

    1.1.1  ”Permeable”

    • A suggestion is as follows (See University of Delaware fact sheet for reference - (attachment Item / link 1)

    https://www.udel.edu/academics/colleges/canr/cooperative-extension/fact-sheets/permeable-impermeable-surfaces/

    • Capable of being permeated,
    • Penetrable especially,
    • Having pores or openings that permit liquids or gases to pass through a Permeable membrane
    • A cloth that liquids can pass right through is an example of something that would be described as Permeable. ... Rainwater sinks through Permeable rock to form an underground reservoir.

    1.1.2 “Permeable Paver” (Amendments as required) A product that is Permeable and allows liquids or gases to go through it at a rate above the requirement of the 100 year storm criteria 

    • Permeable surfaces (also known as porous or pervious surfaces) allow water to percolate into the soil to filter out pollutants and recharge the water table.
    • In Contrast, Impermeable / Impervious surfaces are solid surfaces that don't allow water to penetrate, forcing it to run off
    • Whereby the 100 year storm is defined as rainfall event that has 98mm within a 24 hour period; and
    • The “Permeable product or system” is able to absorb 4 inches of rain in a 24 hour period; and
    • The “Permeable product or system” is able to absorb 4mm of rain per square foot; and
    • The “Permeable Paver, Product or System” can manage a minimum of” 4 inches of rain in a 24 hour period from all side surfaces through infiltration, evapotranspiration, water harvesting and reuse.

    Further References (attached and linked)

    • Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (attachment / link Item 2)

    https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency.html

    • Flood definition (Attachment / link Item 3)

    https://www.ceaa.gc.ca/050/documents_staticpost/54755/96112/09.pdf

    • 100 Year storm (attachment Item / link 4)

    https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/wi/programs/?cid=nrcs142p2_020752

    • University of Delaware fact sheet for reference - (attachment Item / link 5)

    https://www.udel.edu/academics/colleges/canr/cooperative-extension/fact-sheets/PERMEABLE-imPERMEABLE-surfaces/

    1.2  “Permeable System” (Amendments as required) A substance and system that allows liquids or gases to go through it at a rate above the requirement of the Ontario 100 year storm criteria (4 mm per square foot)

    1.3 “Stormwater Management” (Amendments as required) A system that aims to reduce runoff of rainwater or melted snow into streets, lawns, and other sites

    1.4 “Permeable Paver” and/or “Permeable System” has a minimum 15 year warranty

    2. That the Commissioner of Planning and Infrastructure be directed to make all efforts to assist in achieving the spirit and intent of the following and initiate any and all amendment processes where necessary to amend Richmond Hill By-laws including 84-03 (if necessary) to include:

    2.1 The City of Richmond Hill; amend By-law 84-03 to permit upon successful application, residential driveways to be retrofitted and be allowed to have surface area driveways greater than 55% of the property as long as the entire driveway satisfies the “Permeable System as outlined in the Permeable definition in item 1 and meets all qualifications of installation by the warranty provider.

    2.2 Note: A letter or engineering stamp with full warranty information and indemnity must be provided by the applicant for the “Permeable System” or by the product Warranty supplier

    3. That all new planning applications must have Driveways that utilize “Permeable Paver or systems” with greater consideration to products or systems that have reduced GHG emissions

    3.1 Note: An exception will exist for driveways that require gutter systems where Permeable products or Permeable systems may impede drainage and have the potential to create water damage to the property,

    4. That the City of Richmond Hill as a priority objective encourages All Sidewalks going forward to use a “Permeable System” and/or pavers as outlined in Item 1, and in compliance that the system will meet or exceed the 100 year stormwater requirements unless deemed unfeasible

    5. That the City of Richmond Hill as a priority objective encourages All commercial and industrial Parking Lots going forward to utilize “Stormwater Management” practices and “Permeable System” as outlined in Item 1, and in compliance that the system will meet or exceed the 100 year storm requirements unless deemed unfeasible,

    6. That all City departments’ encourage, and support stormwater management best practices of development applications in the Multi-Residential, Non-Residential and Residential Properties.

    7. That for development properties that utilize stormwater management, Permeable pavers or systems, a stormwater and wastewater technical credit or where possible, a financial credit, where applicable, be applied when evaluating planning proposals.

    8. That the City of Richmond Hill provide a Stormwater Credit Program to offer Multi-Residential and/or Non-Residential Property (commercial and industrial) owners or tenants the opportunity to receive a reduction in their stormwater tax charge for implementing and maintaining stormwater management practices of Permeable pavers or systems on their property consistent or exceeding that offered by the City of Mississauga policy By-law as outlined below

    8.1 Example of Mississauga credit program and storm By-Law (item 6 and 7 in attachments)

    https://web.mississauga.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/19160938/09-01-04-Stormwater-Credit-Program-for-Multi-Residential-and-or-Non-Residential-Properties-Policy.pdf

    https://www.mississauga.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/05150013/Stormwater-Fees-and-Charges-By-law-0295-2020.pdf

    9. That as Commercial and Industrial Landowners may receive a form of Stormwater tax credit, so too must Residential property Owners. The City of Richmond Hill staff are to provide options in a report to Council before December 31, 2021, on how Residential Homeowners who expand their driveways and use a “Permeable System” in existing single detached, semi-detached and townhouses, as well as accessory structures, may benefit from Ontario Regulation 299/19 and Bill 108 and

    9.1 Receive a Stormwater tax credit

    10. That all development applications are to demonstrate innovative stormwater management measures as part of their application.

    11. That for properties that utilize “Permeable Systems” and other stormwater systems beyond driveways, sidewalks, and parking lots, such as roof top terraces, an engineering, planning credit and / or financial credit is to be provided as consideration to the applicant

    12. That through the increase of Permeable stormwater management and “Permeable System” usage, all planning applications should be required to provide technical calculations and appropriate credits which should reduce the size and scale of traditional “holding / stormwater ponds” as reductions in holding or stormwater ponds improves public safety, reduces operational costs to the city and assist in housing affordability initiatives by better utilization of land.

    13. That a renewed collective organizational effort to reduce GHG and carbon footprint emissions by specifying and requiring Permeable products and systems (this will assist our Richmond Hill’s Community Energy & Emissions Plan) (CEEP) to become standard for driveways, sidewalks and parking lots which will assist in achieving our Net Zero 2050 targets.

    14. That to enforce and ensure all property owners in Richmond Hill, (as with other Municipalities such as Toronto) follow stormwater management and enforcement practices including

    14.1  Disconnecting any and all downspouts from City’s sewer system similar to Toronto (see below link for reference (item 8)

    https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/water-environment/managing-rain-melted-snow/basement-flooding/mandatory-downspout-disconnection/.

    14.2  A modernized green or blue roof by law be enacted (see enclosed the link to the City of Toronto Roof By-law for reference) for buildings greater than 2,000m2 (See links below item 9 & 10)

    https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/official-plan-guidelines/green-roofs/green-roof-bylaw/

    http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/municode/1184_492.pdf

    15. That Staff undertake all necessary measures to respond to the effects above;

    16. That the City of Richmond Hill send a copy of this resolution to York Regional Council and all other municipalities in Ontario, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.

16.

Explanation: Approved by Council at its meeting held December 9, 2020 - (Staff Report SRPI.20.132)

Explanation: Arista Homes (Richmond Hill) Inc. - 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99, 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, 111, 113 Hilts Drive and 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70 Mallery Street - City File PLC-20-0025

Explanation: OH (Richlands) Inc. - 17, 19, 21, 23, Mallery Street and 44, 46, 48, 50 Brookfam Street and 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73 Ducharme Drive and 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 138 and 140 Hilts Drive - City File PLC-20-0028

Explanation: Deco Homes (Richmond Hill) Inc. - 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 65, 67, 69 Mallery Street, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 Ducharme Drive and 68, 70, 72, 74 Hilts Drive - City File PLC-20-0029

No Item Selected