a) That staff report SRPRS.19.097 be received for information purposes;
b) That the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal be advised as follows:
i. That Council supports in principle the revised Zoning By-law Amendment, draft Plan of Subdivision and draft Plan of Condominium applications submitted by Gil Shcolyar, Maria Shcolyar and Malvina Shkolyar for lands known as Lot 2 and Part of Lot 1, Plan 476 and Part of Lot 47, Concession 1, E.Y.S. (municipal addresses: 27, 35 and 39 Church Street North), File Numbers D02-17028, D03-17007 and D05-17006, for the principle reasons outlined in staff report SRPRS.19.097, subject to the following:
(a) That the subject lands be rezoned from “Second Density Residential (R2) Zone (Residential Multiple Second Density (RM2) Zone)” under By-law 66-71, as amended, to “Second Density Residential (R2) Zone” under By-law 66-71, as amended, with site specific provisions as set out in Appendix ‘B’ to staff report SRPRS.19.097 hereto;
(b) That the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal be requested to withhold the issuance of its Final Order with respect to the applicant’s revised Zoning By-law Amendment until such time as the City advises the Tribunal that:
(i) the draft amending Zoning By-law as set out in Appendix ‘B’ to staff report SRPRS.19.097 has been finalized to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Planning and Regulatory Services; and,
(ii) the applicant’s Site Plan application has been finalized to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Planning and Regulatory Services;
(c) That the revised draft Plan of Subdivision attached as Map 5 to staff report SRPRS.19.097 be draft approved, subject to the conditions of draft approval as set out in Appendix ‘C’ to staff report SRPRS.19.097 and the payment of the applicable processing fee in accordance with the City’s Tariff of Fees By-law;
(d) That the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal delegate authority to the City to clear conditions of draft plan approval and to issue final subdivision approval for the proposed development;
(e) That the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal be requested to withhold the issuance of its Final Order with respect to the applicant’s draft Plan of Condominium application until such time as the City advises the Tribunal that:
(i) all conditions of draft plan approval have been received from City departments and external agencies, and a consolidated set of draft plan conditions has been prepared;
(ii) the applicant’s Site Plan application has been finalized to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Planning and Regulatory Services; and,
(iii) the applicant has paid the applicable processing fee in accordance with the City’s Tariff of Fees By-law;
(f) That the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal delegate authority to the City to clear conditions of draft plan approval and to issue final condominium approval for the proposed development;
c) That 63 persons equivalent of additional servicing allocation (20 semi-detached dwelling units), be assigned to the subject lands to facilitate the proposed development, to be released by the Commissioner of Planning and Regulatory Services in accordance with By-law 109-11;
d) That in accordance with the provisions of Subsection 45(1.4) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended, Gil Shcolyar, Maria Shcolyar and Malvina Shkolyar be permitted to submit a Minor Variance application to the Committee of Adjustment in order to seek relief from the provisions of the Zoning By-law, if required, prior to the second anniversary of the day on which the subject Zoning By-law Amendment is approved; and,
e) That appropriate City staff be directed to appear at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in support of Council’s position concerning the subject applications.